The Steadfastness Fleet: When “National Security” Logic Intersects with the Reality of Israeli Aggression and American Complicity
In a scene reflecting deep contradictions in the logic of power and aggression, the global Steadfastness Fleet set sail towards Gaza, carrying dreams of humanitarian solidarity and confrontation with the ongoing Israeli blockade. However, what draws attention is the stark contrast between Israel’s justifications for its aggression against the fleet, the logic of “national security” raised by some countries, including Egypt, and the US’s unconditional support for Israel’s actions in preventing the presence of solidarity activists at the Rafah Crossing.
Israeli Aggression and American Complicity: Empty Justifications and Continuous CrimesThe Steadfastness Fleet, comprising over 50 ships from various parts of the world, aimed to break the Israeli blockade on Gaza and deliver humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people. Israel, which has been accustomed to justifying its aggression under the pretext of “national security,” did not hesitate to threaten the fleet and possibly attack it, in blatant violation of international law. Sixteen countries, including Arab and Islamic nations like Turkey, Libya, and Qatar, issued a joint statement expressing concern about the fleet’s safety and warning against any unlawful or violent action against it. The US, with its veto power in the UN Security Council, has consistently shielded Israel from accountability for its actions.
Egypt and the Rafah Crossing: Where Lies the Difference?Meanwhile, Egypt raises the banner of “national security” to justify its stance on the movements of solidarity activists at the Rafah Crossing. But here lies the question: Can Egypt’s logic be compared to Israel’s? The answer lies in the essence. Israel uses “national security” as a justification for its continued blockade and aggression against Gaza, while Egypt’s stance seems more complex in its regional and political context. However, the constant is that Israel is the original aggressor, and its blockade of Gaza represents a continuous violation of human rights, with the US providing unwavering support.
Growing Global Anger: From Denunciation to Calls for Confronting the EntityThe Israeli attacks on Gaza and the Steadfastness Fleet did not pass without a global reaction. Countries have started to recognize the State of Palestine, such as Luxembourg, Malta, and Monaco, in a move reflecting Israel’s growing international isolation. Some leaders, like King Abdullah II of Jordan, have emphasized that the two-state solution is the only way to achieve a just and lasting peace. Some voices have even called for more decisive action against the Israeli entity, including calls for preparing armies to confront Israel, in an escalation reflecting growing anger.
The Fleet as a Symbol of Solidarity: A Humanitarian Message in the Face of AggressionThe Steadfastness Fleet is not just a maritime movement; it’s a symbol of global solidarity with the Palestinian people in the face of the genocide practiced by Israel, backed by the US. Solidarity activists from over 40 countries, including parliamentarians, doctors, and public figures, have shown that the Palestinian cause is not a local issue but a global humanitarian one. The International Committee to Break the Siege on Gaza has warned that any attack on the fleet would be a crime and a violation of international law.