However, Dave Ewing, founder of gun advocacy group Firearms UK, urges US citizens and legislators alike not to be rushed into “kneejerk” reactions on the issue.
\n“There needs to be a period of calm consideration, in which we determine what really happened, and what the motivation of the attacker was. It could’ve been a personal grudge, for instance \u2014 the low number of casualties suggests this wasn’t an attempted mass shooting. The shooter may also have been on medication, and\/or a bullying victim, common features of these incidents. It’s also important to remember Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the US, with lots of restrictions on the purchase and ownership,” Dave told Sputnik.<\/p>\n
In its 2017 annual review of gun laws by state, Giffords Law Center ranked Maryland sixth out of 50 in terms of restrictive strength, with an \u2018A-‘ rating overall. In its overview of the state’s gun laws, it notes Maryland ranks 32nd out of the 50 states in respect of gun death rate per capita, and there are stringent restrictions on concealed carry, ownership and purchase of military-style weaponry, and comprehensive background checks.<\/p>\n
Moreover, all gun owners must complete a certified firearms safety training course, no one can buy more than one handgun or assault weapon within a 30-day period, and owners are required by law to report the loss or theft of their firearms.<\/p>\n
“Much more damage could’ve been done with legally available firearms than was in the event, and even if greater restrictions were placed on firearms in the state, there will always be other methods to cause injury and death. I think irresponsible media reporting also plays a role in inspiring school shooters \u2014 people think they can go out in a blaze of glory and secure posthumous notoriety, absolutely certain their name will be everywhere. Widespread news coverage of these incidents has been found to inspire copycats,” Dave told Sputnik.<\/p>\n
The International View<\/strong><\/div>\n\n
In essence, rather than bans and the like, the firearms advocate believes robust background checks are fundamental to preventing shooting incidents \u2014 “isolating those who could cause harm, and preventing them from doing so.”<\/strong><\/p>\nHe points, for example, to the Czech Republic’s gun control system. There, guns are available to anyone with a firearms license, obtainable in similar fashion to a driving license \u2014 passing a proficiency exam and medical examination, and having a clean criminal record.
\nThere are around 300,000 gun owners in the country \u2014 2.72 percent of the population \u2014 of which 240,000 have a “concealed carry” permit. Despite the comparatively liberal availability of legal firearms, the country’s gun homicide rate is one of the lowest in Europe.<\/p>\n
Similarly, New Zealand is home to the most liberal firearm legislation in the Pacific region. There, owning a gun requires a police-approved license \u2014 applicants are vetted to ensure they can securely store firearms, are obliged to attend a safety program administered by the national Mountain Safety Council, and pass a written safety test.<\/p>\n
Police will also interview applicants and two character witnesses, to determine whether they’re “fit and proper” to own a gun. A criminal record or associations, or history of domestic violence, almost always mean an application will be declined.<\/p>\n
In total, 230,000 Kiwis \u2014 4.9 percent of the population \u2014 own a total of 1.1 million firearms. Despite this, between 2007 \u2014 2014 the average number of gun-related homicides in New Zealand every year was just eight, despite the country’s population rising, and the number of guns in circulation \u2014 and shooters \u2014 increasing year-on-year.<\/p><\/div>\n
![\"11111\"](\"https:\/\/www.arabtelegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/11111.jpg\")
<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n